by
Matt Brady
Dan
Didio joined DC Comics in January of 2002 as a relative newcomer to
comics. Not that he hadn’t been reading them or following them, but
he came into an executive slot at DC with no previous experience in
comic publishing, management, or even creation. It was a risk that
caused more than a few raised eyebrows.
Two
years, nine months later, Didio is a well known name, even revered
in some circles as the man who lit the fire under DC Comics to shake
up the venerable comic publisher, and give the whole core “DC Universe”
line and top to bottom shakedown and evaluation. Chief among Didio’s
tasks, he signed dozens of creators to exclusive contracts, guaranteeing
him a talent pool for the future, as well as placing some of these
top creators (as well as fellow VP, Jim Lee) on the company’s top
properties. <i>Wizard</i> named Didio its first ever “Man of the year” in 2003
for his work on the DC Universe, and, given the announcement of his
promotion to Vice President — Executive Editor, DC Universe, it’s
not just the outside that’s noticing Didio’s
work to date.
Just
prior to the announcement of his promotion, Newsarama had an opportunity
to sit down with Didio to talk about a variety of topics.
Newsarama: Let’s start
with the promotion
– what does it mean for you in terms of your overall work on a day
to day basis?
Dan
Didio: Realistically, it really
helps to define my role here at DC Comics, and really, really says
that I’m concentrating solely on the product that we’re creating in
the DC Universe, or the “bullet books” as
I like to call them. What that does also, in working
with my editors here, and in working with the talent, it says
that we’re about to go in a particular direction, which is going to
be my sole focus for the next few years.
NRAMA: The next few years
– so this also means you’re sticking around for awhile?
DD: Absolutely. We’ve
got big plans coming up, and I’m not the type of guy who walks out
in the middle of a movie.
NRAMA: Going back to
when you first came in January of 2002, probably one of the things
you were best known for was saying that you were coming in to shake
things up and change things around – to breathe some new life into
DC’s top properties. Looking back on the intervening two years, do
you feel that you’ve gotten to where you want things to be?
DD: Absolutely not. What
we’ve done is we’ve scratched the surface, and we’ve made great inroads.
We’ve had a couple of what I feel are really steps in the right direction
and great successes, like Identity Crisis, Superman/Batman,
and relaunching the Teen Titans and
Outsiders. Those are books that we feel very strong about and
we’re very proud of.
All
the work we’ve done so far with Jim [Lee] on both Batman and
Superman has also been very important with us. We’ve also gone
to great lengths to establish ourselves in saying that we’re being
much more aggressive in how we attract and work with talent.
NRAMA: So there’s more
shaking to come?
DD: Absolutely. This
was always a long term plan. It always was. There were several stages
in what we did here. The first stage was identifying the talent pool
that we had confidence in and felt could really improve and moves
our books into the future. The second part was to concentrate on building
a strong foundation of the individual characters – that’s where the
conversation always comes back to, putting continuity aside for a
moment - let’s really concentrate on what makes these characters great,
what makes these characters strong, and what we love and remember
most about them. We did that – we started to scratch away at the surface,
and really identify the strengths of who our characters are.
The
third stage is to try and figure out how everything works as a world
– what does the DC Universe stand for, and how do we create an environment
that people re going to be excited about, and want to visit on a monthly
basis.
We
haven’t hit that last stage yet, but we’re getting there.
NRAMA:
With that in mind, and looking towards the future – it’s no secret
that you’ve signed many people to exclusives over the last couple
of years, and some of them haven’t shown up yet with projects. Are
they just closed up in your closet there, working away?
DD: What we’ve been doing
really is identifying the right people for the right projects. A lot
of people, when they signed on, we had projects in mind with them,
but we want to make sure that we’re launching on the best foot possible
when these things come out. It’s not just a question of getting the
right people - the right writer, the right artist, and the rest of
the team on the right character – but it’s also about getting the
book out at the right time with the right momentum and interest behind
it. We could create something wonderful, and I’ve seen this happen
when we put something out there – for whatever reason, the fanbase
or the audience doesn’t come to it, and the book is forgotten, which
is a shame, because we put a lot of hard work and effort into it.
The
books that we are creating right now are the ones that we want t be
sure are here for a long time to come, and people are going to remember
for a long time as well, so what we’re doing is making sure that these
projects are the best they can be, and then we’re going to roll them
out in a fashion that we know they’re going to be seen by the audience.
We
don’t want to get into a situation where the book is ready, and we
throw it out there with no fanfare or hoopla. We really want to go
out and make sure that everyone is aware of what we’re creating, and
get that excitement there.
NRAMA: Talking specifically
about some of the shakeups that have come under your watch, storywise, probably one of the things you’re going to be known
for, better or for worse is Identity Crisis…
DD: I consider that as
a “for better…”
NRAMA: Let’s equate the
events of Identity Crisis to say, making an omelet. Some eggs
had to be broken.
DD: Right.
NRAMA:
You’ve seen the reactions from fans, and have probably heard them
first hand – some of those eggs were people’s favorites. How far is
too far in terms of a storyline that you know is going to be controversial,
in terms of alienating or upsetting fans?
DD: There is a fine line
there, and it has to deal with taste and things like that. We dealt
with some very controversial, very tough storytelling with the subject
matter of the first couple of issues of Identity Crisis, but
I don’t think that the story was told in a poor fashion, that it was
told in an exploitative fashion, and more importantly, it was integral
to what the whole story was about. Even more important than that,
it is going to be integral to the tone we’re setting for the DCU.
The
most interesting comment I’ve seen on Identity Crisis is that,
“Well, this has happened, and it’s going to be forgotten, and we’ll
get on with our lives, and everything will go back to normal.”
Nothing
could be further from the truth. Absolutely not.
If this thing was going to have no ramifications, then there was no
reason to do this story in the fashion that we did it. The reality
is that Identity Crisis is setting a tone that will be playing
out throughout the rest of the DCU for the next year and a half. There
are things that are being dropped there, there are things that going
to be revealed, things that are going to come true, and relationships
are going to change. That’s what this is all about. This is our opportunity
to start exploring who the characters of the DCU are, and what they
stand for. And more importantly, what matters most to them, and how
they all come in conflict with each other, based on their own beliefs.
That’s what makes our characters interesting, and that’s what the
dialogue is about.
I
think the greatest thing about Identity Crisis is that a lot
of people are arguing about the story and about the characters. That’s
what comics are about, that’s why it’s fun to be a fan – to be able
to sit around and argue about whether or not we’re telling strong
stories or not, and whether characters are behaving in certain ways,
or more importantly, what’s going to happen next.
NRAMA: The long reaching
effects of Identity Crisis that you mentioned – are they coming
top down, as part of an editorial mandate, or more along the lines
of individual writers picking up the pieces and looking at different
directions they can go?
DD: What’s interesting
about it is it’s not just about Brad [Meltzer]’s story, it’s not just
about our writers, it’s not just about our editors, it’s not just
about me or Paul [Levitz, President & Publisher], or anybody involved.
We’ve been working on and talking about this for over a year. The
most exciting thing to say about the follow-ups and connected stories
is that I can’t tell you where an idea started, because everybody
has taken ownership of it. Everybody who’s involved is involved in
the process. We’ve been talking about it, and massaging it, and working
it through, so it really has a natural sense of how it can go.
The
thing that we try to do, and thing that I’ve been trying to do is
to work far enough ahead of ourselves so that things can come naturally
out of the story, and not feel like they’re forced in, In the past,
when you’ve tried to build a cohesive universe, or, even do a major,
crossover storyline, they were sprung on the writers or artists, or
anybody else at the last minute, and everybody had to stop what they
were doing, rethink what their book was about, and try to force a
concept into it.
And
it read like that, for the most part. It read contrived.
In
this case, everything is going to come so naturally out of the storytelling
that you won’t know if it sprung from any particular writer’s idea,
because every writer has taken ownership of it.
NRAMA: So the fallout
will be more story-oriented, not a continuing “event” along the lines
of “Identity Crisis: Fallout, part 16.”
DD: Yes – it will be
part of the natural story. You know what I hated when I was reading
comics? Multiple events. The books were so event-driven for so long
– you used to have these peaks and valleys. You’d buy the comic when
the event came out, and stop buying it when the event wasn’t there.
Then you’d buy it again when the next event came along, and stop shortly
after when that event stopped. I don’t want to do that.
I’m
trying to build as diverse a line as possible within the DCU. I don’t
want to stockpile particular characters, or overload stories with
the same characters. I don’t think they have that elasticity, so to
speak, that they can be used and used, and used, and people will continue
to buy anything with that particular character in it.
What
I like to do is diversify our product, but also find a way to keep
all our characters interesting, and try to tell a bigger story so
that people feel they’re always part of a larger universe. If we do
that, then I think we succeed across the entire line, and not just
with a few books.
NRAMA: I didn’t mean
to walk you into a trap on this one, but with what you’ve said against
events, and event-driven storylines…you’re in the middle of one with
Batman: War Games right now. With your earlier comments, would
it be safe to say that kind of story will be moving to the back seat?
DD:
Realistically, if you look at the DC timeline, the last crossover
to that extent, and the last company-wise crossover before that was
The Joker’s Last Laugh, which was also before my time joining
the company, so that’s over three years ago at this point. So, basically,
we haven’t done anything like this in three years, and that was on
purpose. War Games made sense at the time, and it made sense
with the characters. The best feedback I’ve gotten from readers on
that is that every issue of that crossover mattered. As people like
to say, there was no “Red Sky” moment. There weren’t issues called
tie-ins where the only connection was that the skies were red.
NRAMA: That reference
makes sense to fewer and fewer people these days…[Didio
is referring to extremely tangential crossover issues from
DC’s 1986 Crisis on Infinite Earths …
DD: [laughs] But the
reality of War Games is that it crossed over because it made
sense for it to cross over. Just like with Identity Crisis. Realistically
speaking, the books that tie in to Identity Crisis actually
came out as the writer’s choices, not as us imposing any decisions
upon them. Because we felt that the books tied in so closely, that
was the only reason we listed them as Identity Crisis crossovers.
It was never anything that was determined right from the start to
happen.
Going
back to the question as to whether or not there will be more: we will
do events when events are warranted, when the story demands for that
method of storytelling to be used, not because it’s something that
we have to come up with because we want a spike in sales in the summer
or fall.
NRAMA:
Speaking outside of the core of the bullet books, you’ve been behind
the launches of many new concepts, such as Bloodhound, Manhunter,
Enginehead, and The Monolith. They’ve met with
varying degrees of success, some not with much success at all, others
with modest success, but no really breakout hits. Does that trend
concern you?
DD: It’s frustrating
beyond belief, don’t get me wrong. You put your heart and soul into
a lot of these characters, and also, more importantly, the creators
have such clear vision about these books that make them very unique
and wonderful reads.
At
the end of the day, if we put something out that we’re proud of, that
we all believe in, and are glad to put the DC bullet on, then I think
it’s worth putting out, regardless of the sales. When these books
are conceived, we’re all signing off on it. I always tell the creators
that if a book fails, it’s not because nobody believed in it – we
were all 100% behind it, or else we never would have put it out in
the first place.
Sometimes,
the execution goes awry, but that happens in any medium, not just
in comics. I have to say though, that we need to continue pushing
different stories, different characters, and different ideals. Realistically,
what happens if the superhero bubble bursts one day? Where do we stand?
We’re standing with nothing. So what I’d like to do is continue to
expand, and see where there are areas of growth and where there are
areas of interest.
The
good part about being part of DC is that we are willing to take those
risks. We are willing to take those chances, and the best part about
it is that we have a publisher who supports us 100% in doing so.
NRAMA: Speaking of said
publisher, and your position as uber editor
for the line…
DD: [laughs] “Editor
of the editors” as I like to say…
NRAMA: There you go.
Everyone has a mentor or someone they look to as a measuring stick
as to how well they’re doing their job. Who do you look to?
DD: It’s weird for me.
You’re talking to somebody who was, before stepping into this job,
was a 30-year comic fan, so I’ve been following it along, and you
remember things that excite you, and you remember things that enticed
you to want to read comics. You remember golden moments, and you see
when books are created, and when a company had a certain amount of
energy.
One
of the things that I was afforded the opportunity to do when I first
got here was do take my time and go back and dissect what I call “golden
moments” in comics. For me, I identified a couple of key areas – I
looked at the first five years of Marvel Comics, or even the early
‘80s of DC Comics, when there was a lot of creative energy going on
there. I also sat down with Paul, and asked him who he thought, in
the role of Editor in Chief, or Executive Editor – who were t he best
people in those positions, and he gave me his thoughts on them.
What
I was able to do was able to look at how different styles worked in
creating books, in running a line, and I came up with my own ideas.
But realistically speaking, probably the best person who’s been in
some ways mentoring me, and challenging me every step of the way,
and making my life as hard as possible in the best way possible, has
been Paul, without a doubt. Every time we raise the bar, he wants
to raise it a little higher, and I can’t see any better way working
than that.
But
as for past people in this type role and who I look to, I’d be foolish
not to say that there was wild, creative magic when Stan Lee was sitting
in the chair at Marvel; or the fact that when Jim Shooter did his
first five years at Marvel, that he reenergized the entire company.
At DC, I look at Dick Giordano’s years as something that is a golden
moment, where they were not only changing the way comics were distributed,
they were changing the way comics were perceived, and they were finding
a way to change how DC worked as a whole.
So
what I’m trying to do is glom little pieces from here and there on
to a whole – hell, I’ll tip my hat to Bill Jemas and Joe Quesada too,
because when they came in, they set the place on fire over there,
and they forced people to be better, and they forced people to be
more competitive again. There are a lot of things that people have
done well, and what I’m trying to do is identify the strengths – and
the weaknesses – were, and try to build my position and my role here
at DC upon that.
NRAMA: Let’s go around
the horn with a few hot topic questions…first off, it’s not exactly
within your purview, it does have an effect on your job – there will
always be complaints about comic pricing. We’re in a cycle where we’re
starting to see $3.00 become more and more the normal price. How worried
are you about that?
DD: Actually, this goes
back to one of your other questions, which was about diversity and
product. The reality is, an average fan cannot
buy everything we create. We put out anywhere between 50 and 60 comic
a month, and it’s completely ridiculous to consider that someone is
buying all of them.
NRAMA:
If I can interrupt for a second – not to insult the average fan in
any way, but do you think that the “average fan” realizes that on
a conscious level that they can’t buy everything?
DD: I can only speak
to myself from having been the average fan from three years ago. I
had to go out there, I had a budget, and I had to realize that there
was only so much I could do. I had to approach things at the store,
walking in, thinking that I couldn’t buy everything, and having to
make the hard choices.
I
still see folks at comics shops, peeling off one copy of everything, and then
going through the agonizing process of figuring out which ones they
want, and having to go through the process until they winnow the stack
down to a pile they can hold in one hand. If the fan doesn’t realize
that consciously, then they know it subconsciously. The main thing
that we’ve all got to do is to clearly understand that everybody isn’t
going to buy all these comics. They’re going to buy the ones that
matter the most to them and my job is to make that job harder.
But
the reality is that I want to give enough diversity so that we get
a wider breadth of people buying comics. Again, what happens if that
one group of people buying superheroes disappears? What are we left
with? Where does that money go? We want to give them a wide attraction,
and that way, they don’t feel forced to buy everything, because there
are so many different flavors coming from the DCU. That way, they
can buy what matters most to them without feeling that they’re obligated
to buy the entire line.
NRAMA: Another hot button
– incentives and variant covers. Again, it’s not necessarily your
place to be talking about how they affect sales, but from your seat,
what’s the editorial benefit? Are you in favor of them?
DD: I’m in favor of anything
that helps raise awareness of our books. Simple
as that. If that helps raise awareness, then we’ll do it. If
it starts to detract from people purchasing books, then we won’t do
it. Simple as that.
I
heard from a retailer, and he said it very clearly – the question
was thrown to him, “How do you feel about variant covers?” His answer
was, “We hate them, and fans love them.”
As
long as the fans love things, we will give fans what they want. We
will not overdo it, we will not take advantage of the fans, and we
will give fans what they want. How’s that for beating around the bush?
NRAMA: Not bad. But it’s
one of those things – you’ve heard from one retailer, but at the same
time, there are other retailers out there saying that it makes their
lives harder and increases their risk in ordering. For example, JLA
Classified #1, with the 50/50 split, now retailers have to guess
at how many customers will want both covers, and will most likely
end up sitting on some copies. Where do variant covers meet being
a good corporate citizen in terms of the larger market?
DD:
Again, it’s an education process for everyone, to tell the truth.
Realistically speaking…this is a tough question. Where does the onus
lie? Does the onus lie with the publisher? Does the onus lie with
the retailer? Does the onus lie with the customer? Who is the one
determining whether or not variant covers are produced, ultimately?
If the buyers purchase them, then I have to believe there’s a need
for them or a want for them, or a desire for them. If they stop purchasing
them, guess what? They’ll go away just like they went away in the
‘90s, because nobody wants to buy into that game anymore, or jump
on that bandwagon if people decide that their money can be better
spent on something else.
My
job again, is to make sure we’re putting out product that people want
to buy. As long as they want to buy variant covers, we’re there. But
like I said, we will not use that tool haphazardly, or ridiculously,
and I don’t feel that we’ve overdone it.
In
regards to probably the place we’ve done it the most, on the second
and third printings – I think that’s a good thing. First of all, it
helps to vary the look of the multiple printings. It also shows the
fact that, for me, personally, I think the retailers under ordered
our books in the first place, and forced us to go back to second and
third printings, and the different covers reminds them of the fact
that there’s interest in and excitement for our books, and they should
be ordering them bigger right from the start. We’ll keep on putting
the variant covers on our multiple editions without a doubt. Ultimately,
I think it creates additional value for more copies, and the reality
is that the first version will already be sold out, which is why we’re
doing the second and third printings in the first place. So therefore,
the retailers shouldn’t be worried about getting stuck with anything
at that time.
NRAMA: So they will be
continuing?
DD: As long as the retailers
and readers tell us they want them.
NRAMA: Speaking of Jim
Lee for a moment…with “Hush” – there was tremendous, through the roof
buzz and sales. Jim on Superman has relatively great sales
as well, but there’s a lessening of the effect it seems. Is the “Jim
Lee effect” on sales and buzz something with diminishing return?
DD: Let’s first talk
about Jim’s accomplishments. He delivered 12 issues of “Hush” on a
monthly basis, took a couple of months off, and he’s been delivering
Superman on a monthly basis on such a high end that I’d love
to find another artists that is delivering with both the consistency,
the quality, and the quantity that Jim is delivering. That’s the first
thing – the fact that he’s turned out this incredible body of work
in such a short period of time is amazing to me.
The
second thing is, and what I think is more important is that there
is a different level of success in what’s going on with Superman
with Jim. He and Brian [Azzarello] are trying something different
with the character, and something different with the book. They’re
trying to change our perception of what people think Superman is.
It’s a much tougher task than to go out there and use all the bells
and whistles, and pull out all the big guns with Batman. Batman
is a wonderful, wonderful body of work. On the other side of the coin,
Superman is a tougher work, because he’s making people think,
he’s making people look, he’s making people work to understand who
this character is. That’s something that, at the end of the day, we’ve
got great value from the creators out of both of those projects.
NRAMA: So where does
Jim go next?
DD: Jim hears that from
me more than anybody else, I think. I’m always on the phone with him,
and that’s my first question. We will constantly keep on trying to
push and keep Jim going. As long as Jim is excited about working in
the DCU, I know that everything we’ve been doing is exciting.
NRAMA: Going back to
your view of your job of editing the editors – you’ve done some shaking
up on that front just in terms of who’s on what books, for instance,
Will Dennis, a Vertigo editor is co-editing Superman, Scott
Dunbier is editing Challengers of the
Unknown, and there are others. What’s the benefit in crossing
the editorial lines between the imprints?
DD: It’s a relationship
thing. When I first came to DC, I had my fingers in all three pies
– I was involved a little bit with Vertigo here, WildStorm there,
and the DCU primarily, because it was the bulk of the line.
But
the reality of the situation is that we have an incredibly talented
pool of editors, not just in the DCU, but at DC Comics as a whole.
A lot of these guys got into comics because they love superheroes,
and they just happen to be working under different imprints. That
doesn’t mean that at some point or another, they don’t have something
to contribute what I think could help our line, or help with relationships
in regards to people who can work on our books. I think you’re finding
the best people for the job, finding the easiest way to put out a
product, and realistically speaking, we’re in a position here where
we’re able to wrangle it, and be able to control it so that we’re
not repeating product, and everybody stays true to who our characters
are.
We
have such a good rapport between the DCU and Vertigo and WildStorm
that we’re talking all the time. If they didn’t want to be involved,
they didn’t have to be. I saw no reason to stop them from doing it.
NRAMA: In regards to
talent in general…is there anybody else out there in the industry
that you see and think, “They don’t know it yet, but they could come
into the DC stadium, and hit a home run?”
DD: I was asked that
question a long time ago, and I’ll answer it the same way – our door
is always open for all talent. The best people about DC Comics, and
Marvel can use the same argument with their characters and company
as well – the best part about DC is that this is the only place that
you can come to write or draw Superman, Batman, the Justice League,
Wonder Woman, Green Lantern, Flash – all our top characters. If they
have a hankering to tackle one of those, believe me, we will find
a way to get them there. That’s always been my open
door policy. If there are people out there who have such a
burning desire, and a level of talent that we feel can help elevate
our characters and get people more excited about our books, we will
find a way to make that work.
Believe
me though; there are a bunch of guys that I want to get in here.
NRAMA:
Let’s hit a few teases for next year, if we can, because at this point,
you’re probably looking at what, mid-2005?
DD: We’re looking into
’06, my friend.
NRAMA: Oh…okay, well,
it shouldn’t bother you at all to spill some about ’05…
DD: You know what? That’s
a funny question. Everybody is so anxious to know about what’s coming
up that they’re not enjoying what’s happening right now to the fullest.
NRAMA: Really?
DD: I think so. I sat
on a panel recently, and one of the questions was, “I hear Jeph
Loeb is leaving Superman/Batman with issue #25. Who’s going
to be on the book after him?” And this question was asked with burning
desire – this guy really, really wanted to know this, and was pretty
wound up about it.
I
looked at the guy and asked if he remembered that #12 wasn’t even
out yet. He was asking about a change that occurs sometime that’s
farther away than many of the new books we launch even run. Jeph’s
on a run of that book that’s longer than most people stay on books
on a regular basis. Everyone is so worried about what’s coming up
in the future that I think there’re really not enjoying what we’re
doing now. What everyone should be worried about right now is who
the hell is the killer in Identity Crisis? What the hell is going
on in Superman with the Vanishing? How are these mysteries going to
be resolved?
But
I can still tease…
NRAMA: Actually, let’s
go back to Identity Crisis for a second, since you mentioned
it. With the acclaim it’s received, both positive and negative…
DD: Right – it’s great
that it’s positive and negative too. If it’s one flavor, one answer,
then it’s not striking any chords. The fact that we’re able to polarize
so many people with such strong opinion is a wonderful thing to do.
NRAMA: Do you ever catch
the feeling that there are readers who don’t understand that for the
publisher, that’s a good thing? It’s okay that there are people out
there who hate it with a passion?
DD:
It’s okay not to love everything, you know? That’s the wonderful thing
about how we publish what we do – you can live in the ‘40s, ‘50s ‘60s,
the current times, anywhere, because the material is available to
you. What we’re doing right now is telling exciting, compelling stories
for people who are enjoying comics at this moment. That’s what it’s
about. We are writing to the audience that we believe we have right
now, and the reason that we’re going to such lengths, and making sure
we’re so careful in the way we tell stories is because we don’t want
to insult anybody. That’s the last thing we would ever want to do.
We want to tell stories that excite them and that anger them.
Apathy
is the worst response to anything that we create. Everything should
have a strong response, whether positive or negative, that’s what
I look for. Something should generate a response, because what I want
to do is make you come back the next month and buy the next book.
As long as we do that, then we’re doing our job.
NRAMA: That said, and
looking towards the future, is there any fear at all on your part
that Identity Crisis is like the original Crisis in
that you can already feel murmurings of “What’s next year’s Identity
Crisis for DC?”
DD: You’re absolutely
right, and my job is to make sure DC meets those expectations. That’s
what I have to do. That’s why every day, we’re sitting here talking
about story, and talking about how to improve what we put out on the
stands. We never want to be put in a position that we’re putting out
books that we’re embarrassed about. We want to be proud of every single
book that we send out of here. That’s a very difficult task, but we
should never stop trying to achieve that.
NRAMA: Alright – back
to the teasing. Many creators have mentioned it, and you have as well…something
is building towards a big something or other in 2005…
DD: Absolutely. You’re
right.
NRAMA: …
DD: …
NRAMA: Okay, well, thanks
for taking time to chat…
DD: [laughs] Okay - coming
out of Identity Crisis, there are ramifications. Ramifications
on the hero level where they make personal choices; ramifications
on the villain level, where they see how the world has turned, and
as how we put it, they see how the etiquette between hero and villain
has been ignored. There are characters that have made real, life-altering
decisions in the book, that will ultimately
play out further down the line. There are so many strong threads that
come out of Identity Crisis that we were able to hang a lot
of stories on into 2005…
NRAMA: One specific teaser…I
don’t know if you’ve noticed this in the DCU, but there’s this character
named Jason Todd that keeps threatening to return…some of your writers
have teased him out, or perhaps even put him into stories. Any comment
on that?
DD: There’s absolutely
no comment on that [laughs].
Look,
you can look at what’s going on in the DCU in one of two ways – you
can look at it as the editors have forgotten about continuity, and
forgotten about what has happened in the past, and are just moving
things forward. We can look at a couple of characters and a couple
of books and say that very plainly. Or, we can say that there might
actually be a plan here that’s slowly rolling out in the DCU that
has long-term implications for people who want to get on what’s probably
going to be the most exciting ride of their lives.
Okay,
I guess that’s the comment on that.
NRAMA: Fair enough. Wrapping
things up then, on a personal level, since you’ve been in there, what’s
been your biggest fanboy style moment? What’s caused you to forget,
even for a second, that you’re an executive at DC Comics, and just
let loose with an “Oh, wow?”
DD:
I’ll give you three moments where that happened. The first one was
when I sat down with Julie Schwartz, and listened to him telling me
the history of DC Comics. I was captivated. I could have been sitting
in a convention center with 10,000 people around me, listening to
what he was saying – I was completely captivated.
The
second one was…and I don’t think I’ve ever told anybody about this
one – I was in Bob Schreck’s office when
Frank Miller came by to drop off Dark Knight pages when I first
got here. I was standing there, and Frank was there…he pulled out
those pages, and I almost died. To see Frank’s original artwork was
stunning. To see it for the first time, and know that nobody else
has seen it, you feel like you’re in on a moment.
The
third time and this is probably where and when I knew I had moved
into a new place in my life, and in comics. I was sitting on a panel
with Jim Lee, and during the panel, Jim is answering questions – just
in his glib and funny manner. But while he was talking, during the
entire panel, he was sketching Batman. I’m watching him the whole
time – I had nothing to say, because I was brand new to the company,
I had nothing to add to anything, so I just got to sit there and watch
Jim sketch Batman. At the end of the panel, he rips the page off and
hands it to me. All I could think was, “This is so friggin’
cool.”
So
those are my moments, I guess. Just little things that make you remember
what you’re doing, and how much fun this thing can be for everybody.
Releated articles:
Joe
Quesada: Four Years and Counting
Eight
Months In, Erik Larsen, Image Publisher |